<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.6" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Google Have A Double Standard For Brands Regarding Business Listing Spam?</title>
	<link>http://www.semreportcard.com/does-google-have-a-double-standard-for-brands-regarding-business-listing-spam/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.6</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Google&#8217;s Local Advertising Pages For Small Business, &#8216;Look As Good As You Can&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.semreportcard.com/does-google-have-a-double-standard-for-brands-regarding-business-listing-spam/#comment-73170</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.semreportcard.com/does-google-have-a-double-standard-for-brands-regarding-business-listing-spam/#comment-73170</guid>
					<description>[...] The Google Local Business Center sent out their third newsletter last Friday.  Instead of pointing out changes to prohibit spam in the Business Listing Quality Guidelines (Mike Blumenthal chart comparison, Matt McGee recap), the newsletter reflects on the features of Google Place Pages: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The Google Local Business Center sent out their third newsletter last Friday.  Instead of pointing out changes to prohibit spam in the Business Listing Quality Guidelines (Mike Blumenthal chart comparison, Matt McGee recap), the newsletter reflects on the features of Google Place Pages: [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
